SCHLÖMILCH’S THEOREM
SCHLÖMILCH’S THEOREM
In Section 4.3, we provide a modern English-language
translation of Schlomilch paper [22]. Since the basis of his argument comes
from the Mean Value Theorem for Integrals, which he refers to as the
“well-known” theorem, we will provide a few preliminaries in Section 4.2 by
introducing and arguing the following three results: (1) Rolle’s Theorem, which
will be used to prove (2) the Mean Value Theorem, then extend that to (3) the
Mean Value Theorem for Integrals.
4.1 Oscar Schlomilch
¨Oscar Xavier
Schlomilch (13 April 1823 - 7 February 1901) was a German mathematician. ¨ He
studied mathematics and physics primarily in Jena, Berlin and Vienna. Most of
his work was strongly influenced by Johann Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet
(1805-1859). In 1844, Schlomilch received his doctorate from
Friedrich-Schiller-Universität. From 1851 to 1874, he was a professor at
Dresden teaching Higher Mathematics and Analytic Mechanics [13].
4.2 Mean Value
Theorem
Theorem 4.2.1
(Rolle’s Theorem [18]). Let f: [a, b] → R be a continuous function such that f is differentiable on (a, b) where
a < b. If f(a) = f(b), then there
exists some point x ∈ (a, b) where f 0(x) = 0.
Proof. Let f(a) = f(b). Since f is
continuous on [a, b], then f attains a maximum at some point t ∈ [a, b] and a minimum at some point s ∈ [a, b].
Suppose first that s, t is both endpoints
of [a, b]. Since f(a)= f(b), then the maximum and the minimum are equivalent,
which means f is a constant function
on [a, b]. In other words, f(x) = 0, then for each x ∈ (a, b), f 0(x) = 0, in which case, we are done.
But
now consider when (I) s is not an
endpoint of [a, b], or when (II) t is not an endpoint of [a, b].
(I)
If s
is not an endpoint of [a, b], then s ∈ (a, b), where f has
a local maximum at s, and therefore f 0(s) = 0.
(II)
If t
is not an endpoint in [a, b], then t ∈ (a, b) and f has a
local minimum at t, and therefore f 0(t) = 0.
We have proved that in all cases for some point
x ∈ (a, b), f 0(x) = 0.
Theorem 4.2.2
(Mean Value Theorem [18]). Suppose f:
[a, b] → R be a continuous function such that f is differentiable on (a, b).
Then, there is some point t ∈ (a, b) such that
f(b)− f(a) =fʹ(t)(b−a).
Proof. Let
y(x) =
Notice that this is the slope of the secant of the
graph of f on [a,b]. Now let
h(x) = f(x) -
and note that
h(a) = h(b) = 0
and h is
continuous on [a, b] and differentiable on (a, b). Applying Rolle’s
Theorem, there is some t ∈ (a, b) such that hʹ(t) = 0. But since
hʹ(t) = fʹ(t)-
then
fʹ(t) =
Comments
Post a Comment